The Apple Marketing Philosophy, from 1977
▪️ Empathy
▪️ Focus
▪️ Impute pic.twitter.com/5R2Sr8oOes— Brian Wagner (@BrianRWagner) June 30, 2020
Category Archives: Uncategorized
Tweet by BrianRWagner
Tweet by HyltonAnne
I was recently interviewed about something painful in my life. I learned more about how not to be an interviewer than anything I've read/practiced. This is a devastating time for so many, and people don't owe us their stories. Some insights on how to be respectful & empowering:
— Annie Hylton (@HyltonAnne) July 1, 2020
Tweet by cramforce
Over the last weeks I've been thinking a lot of what sets Zoomers and Millennials apart, and I think it is that Zoomers deeply understand that their behavior is input to algorithms rather than just being passive consumers of algorithms. This makes them so much more powerful. 1/🧵
— Malte Ubl (@cramforce) July 2, 2020
Be More Chill (Riends Cast)
Be More Chill (Riends Cast)
July 22, 2020 at 01:34PM
Tweet by aeonmag
Neuroscience is finding what propaganda has long known: nostalgia doesn’t need real memories – an imagined past works too. Editor’s pick: https://t.co/QOxIFHU1KF
— Aeon+Psyche (@aeonmag) July 25, 2020
Tweet by Rasheed_Shabazz
For those interested in Alameda history, this text is considered (by some) as "The Bible of Alameda History." https://t.co/pSfd6Csmns (PDF) #Alameda #AlamedaHistory #alamtg
— RAsheed ☥ Shabazz (@Rasheed_Shabazz) August 5, 2020
Tweet by eliz_blackstock
Neat resource alert: the Trans Journalists Association has curated an incredible style guide re: how to respectfully report on trans communities! It covers everything from language to ethical editing practices, and it is Very Goodhttps://t.co/ApswVGP51n pic.twitter.com/NsOPv15JoM
— Elizabeth Blackstock (@eliz_blackstock) August 18, 2020
Tweet by SwedesinStates
Meet Eric Blomster: The creator of Svensk Husman Socks – the most Swedish socks you've ever seen https://t.co/eYlPxTRQPS pic.twitter.com/4FiW3aqPBw
— SwedesInTheStates (@SwedesinStates) August 20, 2020
Tweet by PatrickGillam
Your evaluation of the late Justice and disagreement with your professor reminds me of this trenchant takedown of conservatism and its apologists:https://t.co/xymjoAwvkR pic.twitter.com/1Qr1ETyAwH
— Patrick John Gillam (@PatrickGillam) September 8, 2020
Tweet by qntm
ME, IN TEARS: you can't just say every single part of a computer system is a file
UNIX, POINTING AT THE MOUSE: file— quarantine 'em (@qntm) September 24, 2020
Tweet by laurendo
Former APF Chief on unbundling police: "I don't think that there's a police officer in Alameda or anywhere else that wouldn't be happy to have mental health professionals be the primary responders to mental health calls, I think that's one.
— Lauren Do (@laurendo) October 12, 2020
Tweet by iwebst
Recent project: scraping 2 million property tax pages to visualize the effect of California's prop 13https://t.co/GgBCAsLDN8 pic.twitter.com/G3g3RZPUHh
— Ian Webster (@iwebst) October 13, 2020
War, Socialism and the Rise of Fascism: An Empirical Exploration
“We document that the increase in the vote share of the Fascist Party was not at the expense of the Socialist Party and instead came from right-wing parties, thus supporting our interpretation that center-right and right-wing voters coalesced around the Fascist Party because of the “red scare”.”
Reinhart Koselleck’s theory of history for a world in crisis
“According to Koselleck, three basic oppositions structure all historical experience. Every possible history is conditioned, first, by before and after, for example the anthropological span between birth and death that makes each life singular and part of a shared experience distinct from other generations, times and experiences. The possibility for new beginnings is as much a part of the human condition as the necessity of death or the ability to kill. Second, all possible history can’t escape the political difference between inner and outer (or, in a conflict, friend or foe). Hence, Koselleck’s repeated critique of the idea that human difference can be morally resolved and not just politically mediated. Only the recognition of difference allows for compromise. Finally, Koselleck claims that the opposition between above and below, ‘master’ and ‘slave’ in the terminology of Hegel and Marx, structures all social relations in history. This isn’t to say that more equality and freedom can’t be gained in the course of events, but that social hierarchies permeate all forms of human community, generating new conflicts and hence new histories.
[…]
The analytical grid that Koselleck suggested as the baseline of his theory of history – before and after, below and above, inner and outer – also conditions historical writing itself. It’s crucial for the viewpoint of historians, whether they are a contemporary or born later, and are thus an eyewitness or a retrospective narrator of events, respectively; whether they are situated higher or lower in social or political terms, for example, whether they are on the side of the winners or losers of the conflict they are describing; and, finally, whether they belong to the political, religious, social or economic community whose history they are writing about, identifying themselves more or less critically with it, or whether they are looking on from outside.”
The Paradoxical Role of Social Capital in the Coronavirus Pandemic
The Paradoxical Role of Social Capital in the Coronavirus Pandemic
“In the King James Version (known to us all from “A Charlie Brown Christmas”) the angels proclaim, “On earth peace, goodwill toward men.” Other translations, in more militant Bibles, render the Greek phrase as “Peace on earth to men of goodwill.” Very much like the question about whether Edwin Stanton sent Lincoln, on his deathbed, upward to the angels or outward to the ages—a thing that might be the subject for a book—the small difference in the Biblical words implies a large difference in our vision. Is the happy news that of Heaven’s dispensation of ever-increasing trust toward all people? Or is it a special favor restricted to those already possessed of good will toward us?”
The Paradox of Individualism and Hierarchy
“Hierarchy is an organizational tool that comes with both benefits and costs. The benefit is that hierarchy is a potent way of organizing large groups. By concentrating power, hierarchical groups can act cohesively in ways that egalitarian groups cannot. (For details, see Peter Turchin’s book Ultrasociety.) This cohesiveness is a huge advantage in group competition. But it comes with a cost — namely despotism. When groups use hierarchy to organize, rulers inevitably use their power to enrich themselves. This despotism, in turn, undermines the benefits of hierarchy to the rest of the group. So to reap hierarchy’s benefits, groups must concentrate power without succumbing to despotism.
Perhaps individualism grows with hierarchy because this worldview is a tool for limiting despotism.”
It’s Time To Abolish Single-Family Zoning
It’s Time To Abolish Single-Family Zoning
The suburbs depend on federal subsidies. Is that conservative?
[…]
In fact, the conservative thing for suburban leaders to do here is to not wait for the federal government to tempt us with more handouts, but to go ahead and show those progressives running the big cities that we live by our principles, that we embrace vibrant markets and free people, by preemptively repealing single-family zoning.
War over being nice
“Most people don’t have the skills to both express their feelings of frustration and anger, and make sure social harmony is maintained at the same time. In this case, do they err on the side of maintaining social harmony at the cost of their own needs? Or do they get their needs met and damn the social cost?”
Wait, what? Sense-making & sense-breaking in modern art
“If we take the predictive processing model as our most-accurate-yet description of how cognition works, we gain insight into how a piece of art or literary text (for example) interacts with our sensory and analytical systems. We gain a vocabulary for talking about what a “schema,” or cognitive knowledge structure, is, and what it means for that structure to learn from surprising events and prediction errors, and how expectations and beliefs at the structure’s highest level can radically distort how sensory experiences are processed at its lowest.”