A Severe Maverick Complex | The New Republic

“In some sense, Kelly’s theory suffers from the same problem that Marxist critics long ago identified in Jacques Ellul’s work on the autonomy of technology: it exonerates capitalism, and absolves powerful political and economic structures from the scrutiny they deserve. But there is also a crucial difference between Ellul and Kelly: the former was on a quest to recast the debate about the technological society in moral terms, while the latter is entirely satisfied with the technological vocabulary and seeks only to expand it with a few terms from biology.”

BGS: Occupied Territory

from: January 18, 2015 at 02:26PM

Tweet by seanlahman


via https://twitter.com/seanlahman

Tweet by thebradmontague


via https://twitter.com/thebradmontague

Tweet by pbump


via https://twitter.com/pbump

Google Search Will Be Your Next Brain — Backchannel — Medium

‘With unsupervised learning, only in the latter stages would the system’s human masters intervene, by labeling the more desirable outputs and rewarding successful outcomes. “Think about little kids, when they learn to recognize cows,” says Hinton. “It’s not like they had a million different images and their mothers are labeling the cows. They just learn what cows are by looking around, and eventually they say, ‘What’s that?’ and their mother says, ‘That’s a cow’ and then they’ve got it. This works much more like that that.”’

“Raw Intellectual Talent” and Academia’s Gender and Race Gaps | Daily Nous

Statistical analysis of gender/race gaps in academia

Quantifying Impostor Syndrome: Gender Imbalance along the “Stack” — Medium

Statistical analysis of gender gaps in IT

Tweet by alexcampbell


via https://twitter.com/alexcampbell

Tweet by NewYorker


via https://twitter.com/NewYorker

Money is the New Morality | Scott Adams Blog

“Luckily we have a better substitute for morality in 2015. It’s called capitalism, social media, and the Internet. Now if you treat others poorly you lose customers, lose job prospects, and lose social options. Capitalism is doing what morality once did — keeping people in line.” Oh goodness gracious no. No no no no no no no.

We Know How You Feel

“But as she delved into the neuroscience literature she became convinced that reasoning and emotion were inseparable: just as too much emotion could cause irrational thinking, so could too little. Brain injuries specific to emotional processing robbed people of their capacity to make decisions, see the bigger picture, exercise common sense—the very qualities that she wanted computers to have.”

Religion, Secular Morality, and What Compassion Really Means for Our Shared Human Future

from: January 14, 2015 at 10:26AM

Kierkegaard on Boredom, Why Cat Listicles Fail to Answer the Soul’s Cry, and the Only True Cure for Existential Emptiness

from: January 14, 2015 at 12:51AM

How judges, loan officers, and baseball umpires overcompensate for past decisions

from: January 14, 2015 at 12:48AM

Deus in Machina?

from: January 13, 2015 at 08:22PM

Tweet by sara_ann_marie


via https://twitter.com/sara_ann_marie

Akira Kurosawa’s List of His 100 Favorite Movies

#2 Editor’s Choice Award: 2040’s America will be like 1840’s Britain, with robots?

“Come to think of it, lack of intelligibility runs like a red thread throughout Average is Over, from “ugly” machine chess moves that human players scratch their heads at, to the fact that Cowen thinks those who will succeed in the next century will be those who place their “faith” in the decisions of machines, choices of action they themselves do not fully understand. Let’s hope he’s wrong on that score as well, for lack of intelligibility in human beings in politics, economics, and science, drives conspiracy theories, paranoia, and superstition, and political immobility.”

The Toxoplasma Of Rage

“A moral action that can be taken just as well by an outgroup member as an ingroup member is crappy signaling and crappy identity politics. If you want to signal how strongly you believe in taking victims seriously, you talk about it in the context of the least credible case you can find.”